The Republican members of the BET have once again cut school funding, this time by $4 million, under the guise of oversight. Their approach has been likened to a frustrating customer service experience where the rep understands your anger but offers no real solution.
Key Arguments from the Republican BET
Why We Approved an $8 Million — Not $12 Million — Increase
The Republican BET defends their decision to approve only an $8 million increase instead of the $12 million requested. This is a clear cut, not just semantics. The $12 million was the result of a detailed, line-by-line budgeting process, and reducing it to $8 million is akin to giving our schools a 'D' grade.
Where Could the $4 Million in Savings Come From?
Oddly, they start by stating, "State law does not allow us to modify line items," essentially admitting they created a problem they can't solve. They suggest cuts to district-wide services like administration, Pre-K, facilities, and transportation, but these are essential services, not luxuries.
Where the $4 Million Should NOT Come From
They criticize the Superintendent's suggested cuts to the Advanced Learning Program (ALP), world languages, and shifting high school start times, calling them highly visible and likely to provoke public backlash. Yet, they previously suggested cutting transportation costs, which would require shifting start times. This circular logic is frustrating and unhelpful.
The Real Impact
This isn't just about numbers; it's about our children's education. The Republican BET's approach is illogical and circular, leaving parents and educators frustrated. As one commentator put it, "Vote for candidates that fully fund schools." Until then, prepare for early alarms and compromised education quality.
Comments
Join Our Community
Sign up to share your thoughts, engage with others, and become part of our growing community.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts and start the conversation!